Head to head
ai-context vs Wolfloyee
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP server: version-correct library docs, code map, and offline drift for your repo.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Monthly 3-question Team Harmony pulse in Slack DMs. Scores stay anonymous until n>=3.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ai-context (71/100 against 60). Wolfloyee is hosted and callable through the gateway; ai-context runs on your own machine. ai-context has noticeably more public adoption.
| ai-context | Wolfloyee | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B71/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |