Head to head
Velrim vs Crawlberg
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Document extraction against a JSON Schema with a calibrated confidence per field; async job status.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Crawlberg (85/100 against 67). Velrim is hosted and callable through the gateway; Crawlberg runs on your own machine. Crawlberg has noticeably more public adoption.
| Velrim | Crawlberg | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 177 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |