Mmcp.market

Head to head

Total Agent Memory vs Wundervault

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Total Agent Memoryio.github.vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory
A
No reviews yet

Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall

Full listing
Wundervaultio.github.wundervault/wundervault-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Zero-knowledge MCP secrets vault for AI agents: secrets injected at runtime, never seen by the model

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Total Agent Memory (85/100 against 66).

 Total Agent MemoryWundervault
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100C66/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars682
Downloads / week166292
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools762
Write actions7—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-152026-09-14
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Total Agent Memory vs rag-ratTotal Agent Memory vs Inite BrainTotal Agent Memory vs IWETotal Agent Memory vs Fidelis MemoryTotal Agent Memory vs ProjectmemAll AI and agents servers