Head to head
Site vs npm Registry MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Vacant Property Security Cost: the site's own MCP server — enquiry (enquiry = a human handoff,...
Full listing
No reviews yet
npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours npm Registry MCP Server (83/100 against 56). Site is hosted and callable through the gateway; npm Registry MCP Server runs on your own machine. npm Registry MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Site | npm Registry MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C56/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | 64 |
| Write actions | 1 | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Security | Security |