Head to head
CRW Web Scraper vs Pullzip
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pullzip
Bio.github.work517/archiveflowNo reviews yet
Inspect, search and safely extract zip/7z/rar/tar archives; repair garbled CJK file names.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 83 out of 100). CRW Web Scraper has noticeably more public adoption.
| CRW Web Scraper | Pullzip | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 1.1k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |