Head to head
CRW Web Scraper vs ExtractEdge
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ExtractEdge
Aio.github.vasilicasijarvis/extractedgeNo reviews yet
Any web page -> clean markdown. Firecrawl-lite, 0.001 USDC/extract (x402, Base), free demo.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 88 out of 100). ExtractEdge is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRW Web Scraper runs on your own machine. CRW Web Scraper has noticeably more public adoption.
| CRW Web Scraper | ExtractEdge | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 1.1k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |