Head to head
Context7 vs ai-context
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP server: version-correct library docs, code map, and offline drift for your repo.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context7 (90/100 against 71). Context7 is hosted and callable through the gateway; ai-context runs on your own machine. Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Context7 | ai-context | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | B71/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 62k | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 618k | 2.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |