Mmcp.market

Head to head

Mem Context vs Total Agent Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Mem Contextio.github.turbyho/mem-context
C
No reviews yet

Temporal memory MCP server with LanceDB vector search, weight-decay scoring, and LLM consolidation

Full listing
Total Agent Memoryio.github.vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory
A
No reviews yet

Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Total Agent Memory (85/100 against 65). Total Agent Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Mem ContextTotal Agent Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100A85/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–68
Downloads / week–166
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools10—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Mem Context vs Basic MemoryMem Context vs IWEMem Context vs ContextStream MCP ServerMem Context vs Agent RecallMem Context vs Mnemoverse MemoryAll AI and agents servers