Mmcp.market

Head to head

SSH — policy-gated remote access vs Sanctions

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing
Sanctionscom.edgethirteen.www/sanctions
C
No reviews yet

Screen a name against OFAC's SDN and Consolidated Sanctions lists before a transaction.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 69). Sanctions is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 SSH — policy-gated remote accessSanctions
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C69/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars746–
Downloads / week6.5k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools32
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-17—
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

All Everything else servers