Head to head
SSH — policy-gated remote access vs ai-disclosure-kit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingNo reviews yet
EU AI Act Article 50 transparency kit: disclosure text, embeddable banner, compliance record. $59.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 69). ai-disclosure-kit is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| SSH — policy-gated remote access | ai-disclosure-kit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 745 | – |
| Downloads / week | 9.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |