Mmcp.market

Head to head

SSH — policy-gated remote access vs Tern EV-Charging Analytics

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing
Tern EV-Charging Analyticsio.github.useternai/usetern
C
No reviews yet

EV-charging site analytics: utilization, demand, peak saturation and corridor benchmarks.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 64). Tern EV-Charging Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 SSH — policy-gated remote accessTern EV-Charging Analytics
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C64/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars745
Downloads / week9.3k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools26
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons