Head to head
MCP Server vs Citable
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web tools for AI agents: scrape pages to Markdown, audit SEO, detect tech stacks, check sitemaps
Full listing
No reviews yet
SEO and AI-visibility checks agents buy per call — USDC on Solana, no API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (89/100 against 55). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; Citable runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | Citable | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 37 | 56 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | 19 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |