Head to head
ebman vs Wraps
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for AWS Elastic Beanstalk: read the fleet; --allow-writes adds two-phase writes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search the Wraps docs and estimate AWS SES costs. Public, read-only, no authentication.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 88 out of 100). Wraps is hosted and callable through the gateway; ebman runs on your own machine. Wraps has noticeably more public adoption.
| ebman | Wraps | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 60 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |