Head to head
Trips vs yesmcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listing
No reviews yet
See what an MCP connector can do for your business, get a scenario map, book a consultation.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trips (85/100 against 60). Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| Trips | yesmcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 277 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 8 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |