Head to head
TasteMaker vs UI Beats
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pull your TasteMaker brand kit + generated Agent Skill into your coding tool. Read-only.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for UI Beats. Let your coding agent search, read and install animated React components.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours UI Beats (91/100 against 67). TasteMaker is hosted and callable through the gateway; UI Beats runs on your own machine. UI Beats has noticeably more public adoption.
| TasteMaker | UI Beats | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 232 |
| Downloads / week | – | 40 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-08-23 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |