Mmcp.market

Head to head

CodeInspectus vs Trent

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

CodeInspectusio.github.Synvoya/codeinspectus
C
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.

Full listing
Trentai.trent/trent
A
No reviews yet

Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 58). Trent is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine.

 CodeInspectusTrent
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC58/100A97/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars479
Downloads / week101–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools7—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-072026-09-03
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

CodeInspectus vs Reversecore MCPCodeInspectus vs MCPProxyCodeInspectus vs SecHelixCodeInspectus vs Sec NportCodeInspectus vs MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorAll Security servers