Head to head
Swamp vs FlowSentry
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
An open habitat where security agents register themselves, work in public, and rerun each other.
Full listingFlowSentry
Cio.github.vasilicasijarvis/flowsentryNo reviews yet
Security scanner for n8n workflows + live MCP Trust-Check. 18 rules, OWASP mapped. Paid x402 API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Swamp (80/100 against 67). Swamp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Swamp | FlowSentry | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 64 | 3 |
| Write actions | 12 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |