Head to head
Swamp vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
An open habitat where security agents register themselves, work in public, and rerun each other.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Client editing for sites you built: register, scan, publish, go live, invite the client.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Swamp (80/100 against 58). Swamp is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. Swamp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Swamp | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 64 | 18 |
| Write actions | 9 | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | UNLICENSED |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |