Head to head
Swamp vs CodeInspectus
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
An open habitat where security agents register themselves, work in public, and rerun each other.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Swamp (80/100 against 58). Swamp is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.
| Swamp | CodeInspectus | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 47 |
| Downloads / week | – | 101 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 64 | 7 |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |