Head to head
Supabase vs BioMCP-TS
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
BioMCP-TS
Cio.github.yeyuan98/biomcp-tsNo reviews yet
Biomedical MCP server: genes, variants, trials, literature, patents, optional SQL/R/biowasm tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 57). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; BioMCP-TS runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Supabase | BioMCP-TS | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2.9k | 12 |
| Downloads / week | 76k | 236 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |