Head to head
squirrelscan vs upkeep-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Website QA for your coding agent: audit SEO, performance, security, accessibility over MCP.
Full listingupkeep-mcp
Aio.github.tiagocalado86/upkeep-mcpNo reviews yet
Website maintenance checks: domains, SSL, uptime, technical SEO and accessibility
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upkeep-mcp (92/100 against 76). squirrelscan is hosted and callable through the gateway; upkeep-mcp runs on your own machine. squirrelscan has noticeably more public adoption.
| squirrelscan | upkeep-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 267 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 89 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 25 | 8 |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |