Head to head
MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted
?ai.smithery/MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhostedNo reviews yet
Manage Supabase projects end to end across database, auth, storage, realtime, and migrations. Moni…
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| MisterSandFR-supabase-mcp-selfhosted | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A100/100 |
| Adoption | — | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |