Head to head
MCPProxy vs Rune
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listing
No reviews yet
Evidence-traced codebase understanding and security scanning for AI agents over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Rune (89/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCPProxy | Rune | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 377 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Security | Security |