Head to head
Reversecore MCP vs Raven Nest
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI-driven penetration testing - 22 security tools behind safety-hardened MCP endpoints
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Raven Nest (88/100 against 77). Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Reversecore MCP | Raven Nest | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 203 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 128 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 44 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |