Head to head
Reversecore MCP vs StackShield
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listing
No reviews yet
External security monitoring for Laravel apps: list domains, trigger scans, read issues and fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (77 and 70 out of 100). StackShield is hosted and callable through the gateway; Reversecore MCP runs on your own machine. Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Reversecore MCP | StackShield | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 203 | – |
| Downloads / week | 128 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 44 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |