Mmcp.market

Head to head

Sitey — free subdomains vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Sitey — free subdomainsmy.sitey/subdomains
B
No reviews yet

Claim a working subdomain in one call — A, CNAME and TXT records. No domain to buy, no account.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 83 out of 100). Sitey — free subdomains is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Sitey — free subdomainsSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB76/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars1745
Downloads / week9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools9
Write actions5
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceISCMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Sitey — free subdomains vs SSH — policy-gated remote access: which MCP server should you use? · mcp.market