Head to head
Sitelemetry vs upkeep-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
OAuth website audits: security, SEO, AI visibility, integrations, accessibility and performance.
Full listingupkeep-mcp
Aio.github.tiagocalado86/upkeep-mcpNo reviews yet
Website maintenance checks: domains, SSL, uptime, technical SEO and accessibility
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upkeep-mcp (92/100 against 70). Sitelemetry is hosted and callable through the gateway; upkeep-mcp runs on your own machine. upkeep-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Sitelemetry | upkeep-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 89 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |