Mmcp.market

Head to head

mcp-local-rag vs visual-intent-layer

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing
visual-intent-layerio.github.willa-code/visual-intent-layer
A
No reviews yet

Point at visible targets in an agent-built interface, and deliver grounded Annotations.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 89 out of 100). mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 mcp-local-ragvisual-intent-layer
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A89/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars3990
Downloads / week4.7k69
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

mcp-local-rag vs ha-mcpmcp-local-rag vs IWEmcp-local-rag vs fiori-mcp-servermcp-local-rag vs mcp-ts-coremcp-local-rag vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers