Head to head
Local Rag vs PageIndex MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reasoning-based RAG system for chatting with long PDFs. Supports local and online files.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Local Rag (92/100 against 66). Local Rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| Local Rag | PageIndex MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 400 | 391 |
| Downloads / week | 4.8k | 47 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-25 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |