Head to head
Huntress MCP vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Huntress endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that delivers fleet-wide incident, coverage
Full listingNo reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL MCP Server (83/100 against 75).
| Huntress MCP | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |