Head to head
Hudu MCP vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Hudu cmdlet, plus an offline SQLite mirror, cross-entity audits, and agent-native output no
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hudu MCP runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hudu MCP | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A100/100 |
| Adoption | — | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |