Head to head
Seatable vs Tenjin
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SeaTable — read, write, search, link, and query data in your bases
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read & publish paid essays. Pay-per-read in USDC on Base (x402); wallet-only, no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Seatable (94/100 against 75). Tenjin is hosted and callable through the gateway; Seatable runs on your own machine.
| Seatable | Tenjin | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 97 | 63 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 23 | 23 |
| Write actions | 6 | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |