Head to head
Godot MCP vs mcp-armor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-driven Godot playtesting: editor control, input injection, game-time stepping, live state.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security sidecar for MCP servers: 11 read-only control-plane tools for prompt-injection checks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Godot MCP (92/100 against 78). Godot MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Godot MCP | mcp-armor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 167 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 679 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |