Head to head
fiori-mcp-server vs redaction
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Takes the people out of text before a model sees it, and puts them back in the reply.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours fiori-mcp-server (86/100 against 67). redaction is hosted and callable through the gateway; fiori-mcp-server runs on your own machine. fiori-mcp-server has noticeably more public adoption.
| fiori-mcp-server | redaction | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 156 | – |
| Downloads / week | 77k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |