Mmcp.market

Head to head

PyreCrawl vs CrawlEyes MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PyreCrawlio.github.SanggonBoy/PyreCrawl
A
No reviews yet

Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.

Full listing
CrawlEyes MCP Serverio.github.waiky-github/CrawlEyes
B
No reviews yet

Web scraping & search for AI agents: extract, SearXNG search, rerank, robots compliance. No API key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PyreCrawl (92/100 against 83).

 PyreCrawlCrawlEyes MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars162
Downloads / week15330
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools134
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-09
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

PyreCrawl vs CRW Web ScraperPyreCrawl vs SvipallPyreCrawl vs NovadaPyreCrawl vs ReplyNodesPyreCrawl vs Web ScrapingAll Scraping and browsing servers