Head to head
Transcriptor MCP vs HumanCraft UI (Antigravity MCP)
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms
Full listing
No reviews yet
Anti-slop, E-E-A-T & human web design MCP server for Antigravity, by AI Build Infra.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Transcriptor MCP (97/100 against 65). Transcriptor MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; HumanCraft UI (Antigravity MCP) runs on your own machine. Transcriptor MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Transcriptor MCP | HumanCraft UI (Antigravity MCP) | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 21 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |