Mmcp.market

Head to head

UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/utf32le-ok
B
No reviews yet

UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (81 and 83 out of 100). UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discardedSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB81/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools30—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

UTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs Azure MCP ServerUTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs SemioticUTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs World MonitorUTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs NetdataUTF-32LE BOM presence, bytes discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers