Mmcp.market

Head to head

Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/tonref-kw
B
No reviews yet

Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (81 and 83 out of 100). Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discardedSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB81/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools30—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Tons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs Azure MCP ServerTons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs SemioticTons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs World MonitorTons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs NetdataTons of refrigeration to kW, number discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers