Head to head
Postgres URL Shape vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Postgres URL Shape (91/100 against 83). Postgres URL Shape is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL MCP Server runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Postgres URL Shape | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 30 | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |