Head to head
Agent Harnesses vs ship.page
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-harness picks, decision guides, and setup templates; live GitHub/HN discovery.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy HTML from any agent: POST markup, get a live URL. Static hosting API with MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Harnesses (92/100 against 60). ship.page is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Harnesses runs on your own machine. Agent Harnesses has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent Harnesses | ship.page | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 906 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |