Head to head
MCP Harbor vs Tenjin
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCP Harbor
Ccom.rustyonmars/harborNo reviews yet
Open Swarm. Streamable HTTP MCP. Search then arrive. Live cap 8. No account.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read & publish paid essays. Pay-per-read in USDC on Base (x402); wallet-only, no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tenjin (75/100 against 60). Tenjin has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Harbor | Tenjin | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 63 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 23 |
| Write actions | — | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |