Head to head
runx vs AgentRank
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
The governed runtime for agent skills. Search the catalog and inspect a skill before running it.
Full listingAgentRank
Bio.github.superlowburn/agentrankNo reviews yet
Search and compare MCP servers, agent tools, and skills using current maintenance signals.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours runx (88/100 against 75). runx has noticeably more public adoption.
| runx | AgentRank | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 91 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | 37 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |