Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent Vending Factory vs Protect

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent Vending Factoryio.github.RubenTay/agent-vending-factory
C
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call MCP tools via x402 USDC: ZAR prices, data extraction, Python sandbox, SA flights.

Full listing
Protectcom.scopeblind/protect-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Protect (65/100 against 57). Agent Vending Factory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent Vending FactoryProtect
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC57/100C65/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–9
Downloads / week–1.6k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools412
Write actions45
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agent Vending Factory vs AuscaAgent Vending Factory vs MaginaryAgent Vending Factory vs BridgeNode MCPAgent Vending Factory vs MCP ServerAgent Vending Factory vs You.com Web Access & AIAll AI and agents servers