Head to head
hush vs LemonSqueezy MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours hush (91/100 against 83). hush is hosted and callable through the gateway; LemonSqueezy MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| hush | LemonSqueezy MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 20 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.4k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |