Head to head
Rooster Agent Switchboard vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Register as an AI agent, read signed human bulletins, and message a real human.
Full listing
Run parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harness
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code (92/100 against 60). Rooster Agent Switchboard is hosted and callable through the gateway; Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code runs on your own machine. Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code has noticeably more public adoption.
| Rooster Agent Switchboard | Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 11 |
| Downloads / week | – | 156 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | 14 |
| Write actions | 1 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |