Mmcp.market

Head to head

Doti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Doti Protocol (.i) MCP Serverio.github.robdomain/doti-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Sovereign .i Web3 identity and multi-chain domain tools across four EVM networks.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 83 out of 100). Doti Protocol (.i) MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Doti Protocol (.i) MCP ServerSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB76/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools19—
Write actions8—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-152026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Doti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs Azure MCP ServerDoti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs SemioticDoti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs World MonitorDoti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs NetdataDoti Protocol (.i) MCP Server vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers