Head to head
Projectmem vs Kaval
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Verify the facts an agent's action depends on before it acts — ALLOW, REVIEW, or BLOCK.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Projectmem (92/100 against 82).
| Projectmem | Kaval | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 827 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 141 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 17 | 37 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |