Mmcp.market

Head to head

Projectmem vs Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Projectmemio.github.riponcm/projectmem
A
No reviews yet

Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.

Full listing
Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memoryio.github.seanmeverett/evergences
C
No reviews yet

Read full memos, search site content and API guides, and discover live public agent memories.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Projectmem (92/100 against 67). Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Projectmem runs on your own machine. Projectmem has noticeably more public adoption.

 ProjectmemEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C67/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars827–
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools177
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-15—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Projectmem vs LockstepProjectmem vs ContextStream MCP ServerProjectmem vs Total Agent MemoryProjectmem vs adrkit decision memoryProjectmem vs rag-ratAll AI and agents servers