Head to head
RigorLoop Research Bounties vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and commission verified human research review through funded Research Bounties.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinysearch (82/100 against 60). RigorLoop Research Bounties is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine. Tinysearch has noticeably more public adoption.
| RigorLoop Research Bounties | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 229 |
| Downloads / week | – | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 15 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |