Head to head
ReplyNodes vs Svipall
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read any page past its anti-bot wall, crawl sites, search without an API key, solve captchas locally
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ReplyNodes (89/100 against 69). ReplyNodes is hosted and callable through the gateway; Svipall runs on your own machine.
| ReplyNodes | Svipall | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 944 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 51 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |